By Adeola Akinremi
The 2014 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), released on
Monday, shows that Nigeria ranks 37th out of 52 African countries.
This appears an improvement from the 2013 ranking where the country
took 41st position, but the Director of the IIAG at Mo Ibrahim
Foundation, Elizabeth McGrath, told THISDAY in a telephone interview
that the score was insignificant, because Nigeria deteriorated further
in two of the four major categories of the index.
The four categories composed of safety and rule of law, participation
and human rights, sustainable economic opportunity and human development
are further divided into 14 subsections with 94 indicators.
According to McGrath, “Since 2009, Nigeria rank hasn’t changed much, it
remains the same. Nigeria has over the past five years registered
slight improvement in overall governance. It now ranks 37 after 52
countries we cover.
“It is interesting because this overall governance slight improvement
marks different trend at the category level. So we’ve seen that safety
and rule of law has deteriorated in Nigeria by 6.6 score point. Human
development has deteriorated slightly by 0.3 point. But for the counter
balance, we have seen an improvement in sustainable economic
opportunities at 3.8 and even bigger improvement in participation and
human rights at 6.4”
In this year’s ranking Nigeria scored lower than the African average
(51.5) and ranked 37th (out of 52) overall. Also, the country scored
lower than the regional average for West Africa (52.2), ranking 12th
(out of 15) in the region.
Mauritius repeated the feat it achieved last year topping the list as
the best country in Africa with 81.7 score in the overall governance
with Cape Verde, Botswana and South Africa in the second, third and
fourth positions respectively.
In West Africa, Ghana and Senegal made it to the top ten scoring 68.2 and 64.3 to be ranked 7th and 9th positions respectively.
Benin Republic ranked 18th, Burkina Faso 21st, Gambia 23rd, Sierra
Leone 25th, Mali 28th, Niger 29th, Liberia 31st, Togo 36th, Mauritania
39th, Cote d'Ivoire 40th, Guinea 42nd and Guinea Bissau 48th.
Somalia has appeared at position 52 to close the list of countries on the African continent.
A social commentator and livelihood right activist, Eze Onyekpere in a
telephone conversation with THISDAY said the latest IIAG is a true
affirmation of Nigeria’s governance status in Africa.
“Nigeria never ranks well. It’s is not a surprise if Nigeria doesn’t
rank well. The competitive index we have had so far has shown we are not
making progress. If you look at UNDP and others, the story has been the
same. So this it is an affirmation,” he said.
However, Nigeria received a relatively high rank in public management
sub-category as 18th country out of 52, but achieved a low rank becoming
44 out of 52 in the main category of safety and rule of law.
The Ibrahim Index of African Governance is an analysis by Mo Ibrahim
Foundation aimed at improving the level of governance of African
countries. The annual index provides a framework for citizens hold
governments accountable, while helping governments to focus attention on
creating prosperous nations by ensuring better delivery of goods and
services, and favourable policy outcomes, across every country on the
continent.
McGrath said: “It is an annual index which is calculated each year by
Mo Ibrahim foundation suing data from 35 different organisations. So
what we do is bring together data of 130 variables and we create
essentially overall governance score for every single African country.
And that overall governance score is the average for the main category
of governance found by the foundation. They are safety and rule of law,
participation and human rights, Sustainable economic opportunities and
Human development.
“What we found for the 2014 index is that is there is overall
improvement in governance on the continent. But we have highlighted some
shift on the overall governance level and governments everywhere on the
continent need to remain vigilant with regards to performance.
“What we have done is looking at African governments’ performance over
the past 10 years and we have seen the main drivers of the overall
positive trend of gain.”
She added: “So when we looked at 2009 and 2013, progress has been
driven jointly by participation in human rights and human development.
“Interestingly, the main driver of gain from 2005 and 2009 has been
sustainable economic opportunities. So in the last five years,
improvement in sustainable economic opportunities on the continent has
dropped slightly.”
Explaining how to look at the index, McGrath said the index should be
looked at as a cumulative data over five years with attention paid to
the 2014 index.
“Every year we refine the structure of the index slightly. So we
improve the indicators that we use and for us to do this, we have to
refresh all of the data back to 2000. So any comparison or rank with
scores of ranks of any country should be done on 2014 index.
“Interestingly, the main driver of gain from 2005 and 2009 has been
sustainable economic opportunity. So in the last five years, improvement
in sustainable economic opportunities on the continent has dropped
slightly.
“What is interesting about the trend in sustainable economic
opportunities is that in contrast to an improvement of 3.4 score point
between 2005 and 2009, the largest in any category in that five year
period, sustainable economic opportunity has registered the opposite
trend in the last five years with the deterioration of 0.2 score point.
“This reversal trend is shown in two of the four sub-categories. It is
in public management and business environment. Also there has been slow
pace of improvement on the continent in infrastructure and the rural
sector,” she said.
She told THISDAY that countries in the bottom up ranking registered the
largest improvements over the last five years, saying “Cote d'Ivoire,
Guinea, and Niger have changed course from having the negative
trajectory to becoming the biggest governance improvements on the
continent and this progress is driven largely by participation in human
rights.
“To counter that, we have also seen historic strong performance from
countries such as Mauritius, Cape Verde, Seychelles, South Africa, and
Botswana who are top five in the index but have shown deteriorations in
at least one category over the past five years, even though they have
improved in overall governance. This speaks to the fact that everyone
has to remain vigilant. All countries should consider that governance
requires ongoing commitment and improvement in governance even if you
are at the top of the ranking.
“What is important is for everyone on the continent to remember that
even though there are positive overall governance trend on the continent
and in countries like Nigeria, there is need to slow down and look at
the data, because it marks a mix message. Some areas of governance are
improving and others are deteriorating and the government especially
should be using the index to identify where they need to be improving
and where resources need to be allocated. The foundation very much
advocates a balance approach to governance. Each of the four categories
in the index should be equally focused on for balanced governance
overall.”
Mo Ibrahim wrote in a forward to the report that “the 2014 Ibrahim
Index of African Governance (IIAG) reveals discrepancies in governance
performance between countries and within the four conceptual categories.
More than ever, these discrepancies call for an Afro-realist approach,
which tempers historical Afro-pessimism and current Afro-optimism.
Anyone who wants a true grasp of African realities must reject the
‘one-size-fits-all’ attitude which reduces the continent geographically
or governance conceptually, in favour of a more granular approach.”
The Ibrahim Index of African Governance published on Monday by the Mo
Ibrahim Foundation, was established by the Sudanese philanthropist, Mo
Ibrahim in 2006 to chart Africa's development progress.
0 comments:
Post a Comment